North Slavic -ě vs. South Slavic -ę

A Problem of Forward Reconstruction

Authors

  • Ronald Kim Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Keywords:

Slavic historical phonology, Slavic historical morphology, Indo-European, Balto-Slavic, Proto-Indo-European phonology, Stang's Law, sonority hierarchy

Abstract

The long problematic correspondence of North Slavic -ě ~ South Slavic -ę in the jo-stem accusative plural and jā-stem genitive singular and nominative and accusative plural is best explained by positing a Proto-Slavic contrast within the soft jā-stems between gen. sg., nom. pl. *-ē and acc. pl. *-ę̄ , which was leveled in different directions as NSl -ě and SSl -ę. With its nasal vowel, the acc. pl. ending must go back to *-jāns, thereby demonstrating that the PIE eh 2 -stem desinence *-eh2s > *-ās was remade to *-āns after the other declensional classes in the early prehistory of Slavic. The Baltic facts are consistent with a Proto-Balto-Slavic date for this innovation.

Published

2019-10-01

How to Cite

Kim, R. “North Slavic -ě Vs. South Slavic -ę : A Problem of Forward Reconstruction”. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 1, Oct. 2019, pp. 1-26, https://ojs.ung.si/index.php/JSL/article/view/4.

Issue

Section

Articles